SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models for predicting response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based models for preoperative prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting molecular subtypes of pediatric medulloblastoma using MRI-based artificial intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning-based models in prediction of the radiological outcomes of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Machine learning-based models for predicting glioma-associated epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Integrative Machine Learning Framework for Enhanced Subgroup Classification in Medulloblastoma.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long Non-Coding RNAs in Malignant Human Brain Tumors: Driving Forces Behind Progression and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Automated Evans index measurement using deep learning in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: reliability, agreement with experts, and association with external ventricular drainage.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedulloblastoma (MB) is the pediatric population's most frequent malignant intracranial lesions. Prognostication plays a crucial role in optimizing treatment strategy in the MB setting. Several studies have developed ML-based models to predict survival outcomes in individuals with MB. In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, we aimed to evaluate the role of ML-based models in predicting survival in MB patients.
methodLiterature records were retrieved on May 14th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted using R software.
resultsSix studies were included, with 2771 patients ranging from 46 to 1759 individuals. A total of 23 ML and DL models were developed, 20 of which were ML and three DL. Random forest (RF) was the most frequent classifier, as it was utilized in nine models, followed by support vector machine (SVM). Eight models were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.80). In addition, the radionics-based and genomics-based models had a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-079) and 0.76 (0.63-0.88), respectively (P = 0.77).
conclusionOur results suggested that ML-based models, especially ML algorithms, could play a vital and efficient role in the prediction of survival of patients based on radiomics and genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.