Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528845›Full record

Trial reportPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025

Open-label, controlled, phase 2 clinical trial assessing the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of INM004 in pediatric patients with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Alicia Fayad, Iliana Principi, Alejandro Balestracci, Laura Alconcher, Paula Coccia, Marta Adragna, Oscar Amoreo, María Carolina Bettendorff, María Valeria Blumetti, Pablo Bonany and 19 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Alicia Fayad *Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Iliana Principi *Hospital Pediátrico Dr. Humberto J. Notti, Mendoza, Argentina.
Alejandro BalestracciHospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura AlconcherHospital Interzonal Regional Dr. José Penna, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula CocciaHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marta AdragnaHospital de Pediatría S.A.M.I.C. Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Oscar AmoreoHospital de Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Dr. Néstor Carlos Kirchner, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Carolina BettendorffSanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina.
María Valeria BlumettiClínica Zabala, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo BonanyEstablecimiento Asistencial Dr. Lucio Molas, Santa Rosa, Argentina.
María Laura Flores TonfiSanatorio Güemes, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luis FlynnSanatorio de Niños, Rosario, Argentina.
Lidia GhezziHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jorge MonteroHospital Interzonal Especializado Materno Infantil Don Victorio Tetamanti, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Flavia RamírezHospital Provincial Neuquén, Dr. Eduardo Castro Rendón, Neuquén, Argentina.
Claudia SeminaraHospital de Niños de La Santísima Trinidad, Córdoba, Argentina.
Ángela SuarezHospital de Niños Sor María Ludovica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana Paula SpizzirriHospital de Niños Sor María Ludovica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marta RivasInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana PichelInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vanesa ZylbermanInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Linus SpatzInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carolina MassaInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marina ValerioInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago SanguinetiInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana ColonnaInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ian RoubicekInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando GoldbaumInmunova SA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. fgoldbaum@inmunova.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-3002
INM004 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) is a severe condition mainly affecting children. It is one of the leading causes of acute kidney injury in the pediatric population. There is no established therapy for this disease. INM004 is an anti-Shiga toxin composed of equine polyclonal antibodies. This study is aimed at assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of INM004 in pediatric patients with STEC-HUS.

methodsPhase 2, open-label clinical trial with an historical control arm. Patients in the treatment arm received two doses of INM004. The primary endpoints were the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy (dialysis days) of INM004. Secondary endpoints included other kidney and extrarenal outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for efficacy comparisons between arms.

resultsFifty-seven and 125 patients were enrolled in the treatment and control arm, respectively. After propensity score matching, 52 patients remained in each arm. INM004 was well-tolerated. Eight adverse events were considered possibly related, none of which were serious or severe. In the primary efficacy endpoint, patients of the treatment arm presented a non-statistically significant difference of two dialysis days. On secondary endpoints, non-statistically significant trends toward fewer patients needing dialysis and dialysis for more than 10 days, and shorter time to glomerular filtration rate normalization, were observed favoring the treatment arm.

conclusionsINM004 showed an adequate safety profile. Efficacy non-statistically significant trends suggesting a beneficial effect in the amelioration of kidney injury were observed. These results encourage the conduction of a phase 3 study of INM004 in pediatric patients with STEC-HUS.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleTreatment OutcomeAcute kidney injuryClinical trial, Phase 2Hemolytic uremic syndromePassive immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39528845
PMCPMC12031759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.