Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528778›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025

Survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy based on claudin 18.2 expression.

Hyung-Don Kim, Jinho Shin, Jaewon Hyung, Hyungeun Lee, Meesun Moon, Jeongeun Ma, Young Soo Park, Min-Hee Ryu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Predictive value of EBV-positivity in patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hyung-Don Kim *Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinho Shin *Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Jaewon HyungDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyungeun LeeDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Meesun MoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeongeun MaDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Soo ParkDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Min-Hee RyuDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. miniryu@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClaudin 18.2 has emerged as a viable therapeutic target in gastric cancer; however, its clinical relevance in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy is not known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy according to claudin 18.2 expression in patients with gastric cancer.

methodsThis single-center study included patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n = 204) or chemotherapy alone (n = 183) whose claudin 18.2 immunohistochemistry results were available. Claudin 18.2 positivity (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥ 75% by the 43-14A clone) was analyzed in terms of efficacy outcomes.

resultsAmong patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 96 (47.1%) were assessed to have claudin 18.2-positive tumors. Between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors, objective response rate with nivolumab plus chemotherapy was comparable. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy were comparable between those with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. For both subgroups with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥ 5 and < 5, PFS and OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy were also comparable between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. A consistent trend of favorable PFS and OS was observed with nivolumab plus chemotherapy compared to that of chemotherapy alone in both claudin 18.2-positive and -negative subgroups.

conclusionThe efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not vary according to claudin 18.2 positivity. The clinical benefit of nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy was consistently observed in claudin 18.2-positive and -negative gastric cancer cases.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClaudinsNivolumabStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorClaudinsCLDN18 protein, humanNivolumabClaudin 18.2Gastric cancerNivolumab plus chemotherapyPredictive biomarker

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.