ArticleScientific reports2024
Longitudinal association between posterior occlusal contact and dementia development in a large retrospective cohort study using a Japanese claims database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Masticatory Dysfunction and Hippocampal Volume in Ageing Adults: An MRI-Based Scoping Review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Reduced Posterior Occlusal Contacts Are Associated With an Increased Risk of Stroke: A Retrospective Study Based on a Japanese Claims Database.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Role of Posterior Occlusal Support in the Development of Frailty Among Japanese Adults: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the association between posterior occlusal contact and the risk of dementia development in the Japanese population, utilizing Eichner classification to evaluate occlusal status. Data from Japanese health insurance claims were analyzed for the period from April 2016 to March 2022. Participants had undergone specific health checkups, had no prior history of dementia, and were classified according to their dental occlusal contact. Dementia diagnoses were determined using ICD-10 codes, and participants were divided into three groups-A, B, and C-based on the Eichner classification, which indicates the extent of occlusal contact. Over an average follow-up period of 35.6 months, 691 dementia were identified among 931,309 participants. Those diagnosed with dementia were more likely to belong to Eichner B and C groups, signifying reduced occlusal contact. After adjusting for covariates, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for Eichner B and C were 1.73 (1.31-2.28) and 2.10 (1.35-3.26), respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings in adults aged 60-75. These findings suggest that reduced posterior occlusal contact correlates with an increased risk of dementia. Since the study is limited to participants under the age of 75, further research is required to determine its generalizability to older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.