ArticleInflammation2025
Identification of a 5-Plex Cytokine Signature that Differentiates Patients with Multiple Systemic Inflammatory Diseases.
Article in Inflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes and Diagnostic Value of Serum CCL26 and CCR3 in T2DM with Lower Extremity Artery Disease.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with non-infectious systemic inflammation may suffer from one of many diseases, including hyperinflammation (HI), autoinflammatory disorders (AID), and systemic autoimmune disease (AI). Despite their clinical overlap, the pathophysiology and patient management differ between these disorders. We aimed to investigate blood biomarkers able to discriminate between patient groups. We included 44 patients with active clinical and/or genetic systemic inflammatory disease (9 HI, 27 AID, 8 systemic AI) and 16 healthy controls. We quantified 55 serum proteins and combined multiple machine learning algorithms to identify five proteins (CCL26, CXCL10, ICAM-1, IL-27, and SAA) that maximally separated patient groups. High ICAM-1 was associated with HI. AID was characterized by an increase in SAA and decrease in CXCL10 levels. A trend for higher CXCL10 and statistically lower SAA was observed in patients with systemic AI. Principal component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering confirmed separation of disease groups. Logistic regression modelling revealed a high statistical significance for HI (P = 0.001), AID, and systemic AI (P < 0.0001). Predictive accuracy was excellent for systemic AI (AUC 0.94) and AID (0.91) and good for HI (0.81). Further research is needed to validate findings in a larger prospective cohort. Results will contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory disorders and can improve diagnosis and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.