SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2025
Bone graft substitutes and dental implant stability in immediate implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Revisited: A Multimodal Evaluation of Bone Preservation and Regeneration-Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Dental Implants in Routine Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImplant dentistry is currently being revolutionized by breakthroughs in techniques, technology, and material, there are few systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examine the effects of utilizing different bone graft substitutes in immediate implant placement surgeries.
aimThe purpose of this research is to systematically review and meta-analyze the effect that different bone graft substitutes have on implant stability when concurrently utilized in patients undergoing immediate implant surgeries. METHODOLOGY: The PICO criteria were used to construct the focused question, and the systematic review has been outlined as per the PRISMA guidelines. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias method for randomized trials was used to assess the risk of bias for the selected articles. To derive estimates for the results, random effects meta-analysis was conducted on the selected articles.
resultsThe electronic databases were searched and a total of 1583 articles were identified. After title and abstract screening and due to problems in retrieval a further 1358 articles were eliminated. Fifteen articles were finally chosen to be qualified for review. Of which full text evaluation of 5 articles were found to meet the eligibility criteria and were therefore included in the systematic review.
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis on the stability of dental implants and bone graft substitutes in immediate implant surgery, was unable to draw any conclusions and established no statistically significant correlation between the different types of grafts used and implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.