Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528712›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessment of knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals towards Mpox in a Nigerian hospital.

Edidiong Orok, God'sTreasure Adele, Olawale Oni, Adegboyega Adelusi, Toba Bamitale, Boluwaji Jaiyesimi, Alice Saka, Titilayo Apara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edidiong OrokDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Public Health, College of Pharmacy, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria. pharmorok@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-1927
God'sTreasure AdeleDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Olawale OniDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Adegboyega AdelusiDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Toba BamitaleDepartment of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, College of Science, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Boluwaji JaiyesimiDepartment of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, College of Science, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Alice SakaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.
Titilayo AparaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mpox is a zoonotic viral disease that presents significant public health challenges. Despite the pivotal role of healthcare workers, research on their knowledge and attitudes towards mpox is limited. This study aimed to assess healthcare workers' knowledge, awareness and attitude regarding mpox as well as associated factors at Rivers State University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. A descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed, utilizing a 34-item semi-structured questionnaire. Knowledge levels were categorized as good (> 70% score), fair (50-69%), or poor (< 50%), while attitudes were classified as positive (> 70% score), moderate (50-69%), or negative (< 50%). Statistical analyses included independent sample T-test, One-way Analysis of Variance, and Chi-square tests. Among a total of 227 healthcare professionals, majority were females (59%) and singles (54.2%). Over 79% correctly identified mpox as a viral infection, while 59.9% recognized its potential transmission through a monkey bite. Overall, 22.5% demonstrated good knowledge. Majority (61.7%) acknowledged the potential of mpox as a worldwide pandemic, with 89% agreeing it could strain affected countries' healthcare systems. Healthcare workers exhibited moderate to positive attitudes towards mpox. Gender (Males, (p = 0.003), age (> 40 years (p = 0.008), years of experience (6-10 years; (p < 0.001), professional qualification (physicians, (p = 0.002), and previous mpox training (p < 0.001) significantly influenced knowledge levels, but no significant associations were found between demographic variables and attitudes. The study revealed a high level of awareness but low to fair knowledge among most participants. Healthcare professionals also demonstrated moderate to positive attitudes towards mpox. Factors such as gender, age, years of experience, professional qualification, and previous training on mpox influenced knowledge levels, but did not influence attitude in the study participants highlighting the importance of targeted educational interventions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelAdultAnimalsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxNigeriaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZoonosesAttitudeAwarenessHealthcare professionalsKnowledgeMpoxNigeria

Identifiers

PMID39528712
PMCPMC11555280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.