ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Long-term outcomes after open parastomal hernia repair at a high-volume center.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of different mesh placement techniques for parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Parastomal Hernia: Rethinking Prevention and Repair in Contemporary Colorectal Surgery.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Parastomal hernia in the difficult patient: is Tophat plasty the solution?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Observational
- Long-term outcomes of open local onlay mesh parastomal hernia repair with ostomy revision.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic parastomal hernia repair with reinforced tissue matrix; lessons learned from our 74-patient cohort.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
- Article
- The Local Parastomal Hernia (LoPa) Repair: A Novel Approach to Parastomal Hernia Repair.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen parastomal hernia repairs (OPHR) are complex with high recurrence rates and no clear optimal technique. This report summarizes long-term OPHR outcomes at a high-volume hernia center.
methodsOPHRs were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Recurrence and wound complication rates were compared across operative techniques using standard statistical analysis.
resultsOf 97 OPHR patients, mean age was 61.9 ± 12.6 years, 56.7% were female, 24.7% were diabetic, and average BMI was 31.3 ± 6.5 kg/m
conclusionThis study represents the largest series to date describing long-term OPHR outcomes with a variety of techniques. Recurrence was greatest after in situ primary repair. There were no recurrences after stoma reversal. After ostomy resiting, all recurrences occurred at the new stoma site, independent of prophylactic mesh use. When the stoma was repaired in situ, preperitoneal mesh placement had the lowest recurrence. Optimal technique for OPHR remains unclear, but these results may inform preoperative discussions and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.