Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025
Three-year follow-up outcomes of postoperative quality of life from a randomized controlled trial comparing multi-port versus single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of left-sided three-port laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has become widely used; minimally invasive surgery has become the mainstream of treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare long-term quality of life (QoL) and weight loss rates in patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (SLG) or multi-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (MLG) for gastric cancer.
methodsThis single-center RCT compared MLG and SLG in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer, all of which underwent distal gastrectomy between April 2016 and September 2018. A total of 101 patients were evaluated for eligibility; all were randomized into either the SLG group (n = 50) or MLG group (n = 51). Blood tests, weight measurements, and postoperative questionnaires (DAUGS20, EORTC QLQ-C30, PGSAS-45) were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery to compare the QoL.
resultsAt six months postoperatively, there was a higher trend toward lower weight loss in the SLG group compared with the MLG group. At 1, 3, 6, and 36 months postoperatively, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly lower in the SLG group than that in the MLG group. The QoL, as measured using the postoperative questionnaires, was generally comparable. However, some favorable results, such as fewer diarrheas, were achieved.
conclusionsSLG was partially superior to MLG in terms of long-term QoL, in addition to assurance of esthetics and reduced pain. In addition, systemic inflammatory markers and weight loss rates were lower, suggesting a potential long-term benefit. SLG may be an option for stage I gastric cancer surgery. Further follow-up and multicenter studies should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.