Observational studySurgical endoscopy2025
Inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic mesh removal for chronic pain: a single-center experience with 11 years of practice.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging for visualization, segmentation and 3D reconstruction of surgical meshes in the lower abdomen: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Preliminary results of surgical intervention for patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUp to 12% of patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair may develop chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), possibly explained by the presence of mesh. Recent studies reported that laparoscopic mesh removal is feasible and safe. However, the risk of a hernia recurrence is unknown. This observational study describes the rate of hernia recurrence and evolution in pain score following laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP after preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.
methodsProspectively collected questionnaires and operative notes of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP in our center of expertise between November 2011 and July 2022 were studied. Pain scores were quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). The presence of a hernia recurrence was based on patient history and clinical findings.
resultsA total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, and data of 83 patients (93% response rate) were available for analysis. Median decrease in pain score (NRS) after mesh removal was 4 (range + 2 to - 9). After a median 4.3 years follow up period, a hernia recurrence was present in 18 patients (21.7%). Of these, eight were symptomatic requiring correction using a Lichtenstein repair with a favorable outcome whereas a wait-and-see approach was successfully followed in the remaining 10 patients.
conclusionLaparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP following preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair resulted in an inguinal hernia recurrence in one of five patients requiring remedial surgery in one in ten patients. This knowledge may inform the preoperative counseling process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39528657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.