ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of Bio and water-soluble fertilizers on sweet potato yield, quality and soil properties in a continuous cropping system under plastic film-mulched drip-fertigated field conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of long term-consecutive monoculture on fungal community structure and function in the rhizosphere of Chinese yam.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To verify an effective approach for alleviating problems associated with the consecutive monoculture of sweet potato, five fertilizer treatments were designed under plastic film-mulched, drip-fertigated conditions in fields continuously planted with sweet potato over five years. These treatments included: (1) no fertilizer application, (2) basic application of water-soluble (WS) fertilizer, (3) basic application of biofertilizer (BF) and WS fertilizer, (4) split application of WS fertilizer, and (5) combined basic application of BF and split application of WS fertilizer. The effects of BF and WS fertilizer applications on yield, quality, and soil properties were evaluated. Fertilizer applications had positive effects on increasing soil activities and nutrients compared with no fertilizer application. Split fertigation with WS fertilizer increased the activities of soil dehydrogenase (DHA) by 10.94 ~ 14.74%, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) by 4.97 ~ 5.13%, and soil organic matter (SOM) by 10.43 ~ 12.47% in the second year compared with a single application. In both years, split fertigation exerted positive effects on increasing dry matter (DM) accumulation in tuberous roots and increased the productive efficiency in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizers. BF application for two consecutive years increased the activities of soil sucrase by 7.05 ~ 17.83%, DHA by 18.65 ~ 21.34%, ALP by 6.87 ~ 7.03%, soil available P by 18.34 ~ 28.10%, and SOM by 8.18 ~ 10.17% compared with the no BF application. BF also increased the root yield by 8.88 ~ 14.14%, the carotenoid content in tuberous roots by 20.38 ~ 30.64%, and the K utilization efficiency by 11.09 ~ 14.97%. The combination of BF and split fertigation for two consecutive years was most conducive to the activation of soil nutrients, maintenance of soil fertility, and improvement in yield and quality, which could mitigate problems associated with the consecutive monoculture of sweet potato.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.