ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel approach to double-strand DNA break analysis through γ-H2AX confocal image quantification and bio-dosimetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Epigenetic remodeling during UV exposure: high resolution analysis of histone post-translational modifications in a DNA binding protein 2 mutant model.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic γ-H2AX response in blood lymphocytes for prediction of radiotherapy induced bladder toxicity in cervical cancer patients.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- MOF promotes cisplatin resistance in lung cancer cells by enhancing WSTF acetylation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Combinational Radiotherapies Improve Brain Cancer Treatment at High Dose Rates In Vitro.Cancers · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional bioprinted in vitro glioma tumor constructs for synchrotron microbeam radiotherapy dosimetry and biological study using gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbeam Radiation Therapy Bio-Dosimetry Enhanced by Novel Radiosensitiser Combinations in the Treatment of Brain Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA damage occurs in all living cells. γ-H2AX imaging by fluorescent microscopy is widely used across disciplines in the analysis of double-strand break (DSB) DNA damage. Here we demonstrate a method for the quantitative analysis of such DBSs. Ionising radiation, well known to induce DSBs, is used in this demonstration, and additional DBSs are induced if high-Z nanoparticles are present during irradiation. As a deliberate test of the methodology, cells are exposed to a spatially fractionated ionising radiation field, characterised by regions of high and low absorbed radiation dose that are only ever qualitatively verified biologically via γ-H2AX imaging. Here we validate our bio-dosimetric quantification method using γ-H2AX assays in the assessment of DSB enhancement. Our method reliably quantifies DSB enhancement in cells when exposed to either a spatially contiguous or fractionated irradiation fields. Using the γ-H2AX assay, we deduce the biological dose response, and for the first time, demonstrate equivalence to the independently measured physical absorbed dose. Using our novel method, we are also able quantify the nanoparticle DSB enhancement at the cellular level, which is not possible using physical dose measurement techniques. Our method therefore provides a new paradigm in γ-H2AX image quantification of DSBs, as well as an independently validated bio-dosimetry technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.