Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39528541›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Data free knowledge distillation with feature synthesis and spatial consistency for image analysis.

Pengchen Liang, Jianguo Chen, Yan Wu, Bin Pu, Haishan Huang, Qing Chang, Guo Ran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengchen Liang *The Department of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Jianguo Chen *School of Software Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
Yan Wu *Huangdu Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Bin PuDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Haishan HuangSchool of Software Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
Qing ChangThe Department Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Department of Surgery, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201800, China. robie0510@hotmail.com.
Guo RanThe Department of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China. ranguo@eentanesthesia.com.

Funding

The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515011179The Shanghai University of Engineering Science Medical-Engineering Interdisciplinary Project 2023LXY-RUIJINO1Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Privacy and security concerns restrict access to original training datasets, posing significant challenges for model compression. Data-Free Knowledge Distillation (DFKD) emerges as a solution, aiming to transfer knowledge from teacher to student networks without accessing original data. Existing DFKD methods struggle to generate high-quality synthetic samples that capture the complexities of real-world data, leading to suboptimal knowledge transfer. Moreover, these approaches often fail to preserve the spatial attributes of the teacher network, resulting in shortcut learning and limited generalization.To address these issues, a novel DFKD strategy is proposed with three innovations: (1) an enhanced DCGAN generator with an attention module for synthesizing samples with improved micro-discriminative features; (2) a Multi-Scale Spatial Activation Region Consistency (MSARC) mechanism to accurately replicate the teacher's spatial attributes; and (3) an adversarial learning framework that creates a dynamic competitive environment between the generative and distillation phases. Rigorous evaluation of the method on several benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny-ImageNet, and medical imaging datasets such as PathMNIST, BloodMNIST, and PneumoniaMNIST, demonstrates superior performance compared to existing DFKD methods. Specifically, on CIFAR-100, the student network attains an accuracy of 77.85%, surpassing previous methods like CMI and SpaceshipNet. On BloodMNIST, the method achieves an accuracy of 80.50%, outperforming the next best method by over 5%.

Indexed as

Adversarial learningData-free knowledge distillationEnhanced DCGAN with attentionMulti-scale spatial activation consistency

Identifiers

PMID39528541
PMCPMC11555069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.