ArticleScientific reports2024
Hematological changes in women with cervical cancer before and after cancer treatment: retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary chemoradiation versus radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for stage IIICr cervical cancer without parametrial involvement: gynecologic oncology research investigators collaboration study (GORILLA-1002).Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia following definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A case report.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Comparative Effect of African Walnut Oil and Docosahexaenoic Acid on Hematological and Oxidative Stress Markers of Female Wistar Rats With 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Breast Cancer.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Three-year post-recurrence survival outcome by leukopenia grade 2+ during systemic chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
- Review
- Case Report: PRaG 3.0 therapy for advanced cervical cancer with severe comorbidities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Anemia and hematocrit decline in cervical cancer: unveiling clinical consequences and management strategies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) as a Data Analysis Method Identifying Potential Hematological Parameters for Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematological changes is one of the most common complications occurred in cancer patients. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the hematological toxicity of cervical cancer patients before and after the initiation of treatment. The retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2022 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. The hematological profile and sociodemographic and clinical data of the cervical cancer patients were collected using data extraction sheets. The Epidata version 3.1 and SPSS version 25 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the data. To compare the median differences in hematological parameters before and after treatment, the Wilcoxon rank test was used. In addition, to assess the presence of an independent association between hematological abnormalities and the independent variables, logistic regression models were used. A p value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance for all tests. In current study, the median (Interquartile range) of hemoglobin levels, white blood cell counts, and platelet counts, before treatment were 13.2 (12.1, 15) g/dl, 7.5 (5.8, 11.8) *10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.