ArticleMicrobes and infection
Bad company? The pericardium microbiome in people investigated for tuberculous pericarditis in an HIV-prevalent setting.
Article in Microbes and infection. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond bacilli: integrating the microbiome into the TB research agenda.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Blood RNA biomarkers and C-reactive protein for triage of adult patients with tuberculosis lymphadenitis and pericarditis in South Africa: a single-centre, prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study.The Lancet. Microbe · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe site-of-disease microbiome and predicted metagenome were evaluated in a cross-sectional study involving people with presumptive tuberculous pericarditis. We also explored the interaction between C-reactive protein (CRP) and the microbiome.
methodsPeople with effusions requiring diagnostic pericardiocentesis (n=139) provided pericardial fluid for sequencing and blood for CRP measurement.
resultsPericardial fluid microbiota differed in β-diversity among people with definite (dTB, n=91), probable (pTB, n=25), and non- (nTB, n=23) tuberculous pericarditis. dTBs were Mycobacterium-, Lacticigenium-, and Kocuria-enriched vs. nTBs. HIV-positive dTBs were Mycobacterium-, Bifidobacterium-, Methylobacterium-, and Leptothrix-enriched vs. HIV-negative dTBs. HIV-positive dTBs on ART were Mycobacterium- and Bifidobacterium-depleted vs. those not on ART. dTBs exhibited enrichment in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and mycobacterial metabolism pathways vs. nTBs. Additional non-pericardial involvement (pulmonary infiltrates) was associated with Mycobacterium-enrichment and Streptococcus-depletion. Mycobacterium reads were in 34 % (31/91) of dTBs, 8 % (2/25) of pTBs and 17 % (4/23) nTBs. People with CRP above (vs. below) the median value had different β-diversity (Pseudomonas-depleted). No correlation was found between enriched taxa in dTBs and CRP.
conclusionsPericardial fluid microbial composition varies by tuberculosis status, HIV (and ART) status and dTBs are enriched in SCFA-associated taxa. The clinical significance, including mycobacterial reads in nTBs and pTBs, requires evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.