ArticleCaries research2025
Is Poor Self-Rated Health Associated with Higher Caries Experience in Adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study.
Article in Caries research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral Health-Related Quality of Life After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant-A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe association between lower socioeconomic status and a higher risk of dental caries is well established, but the independent association between general health status and dental caries on a population level is less investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the association between self-rated general health and caries experience in an adult Norwegian population and to assess if the associations were modified by age and sex.
methodsData were collected as part of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) conducted 2017-2019 and a randomly selected subsample (20%) were invited for the HUNT4 Oral Health Study. This cross-sectional study included 4,880 dentate participants aged 19-94 years (response rate 67%). Participants underwent clinical and radiographic oral examinations and caries experience was measured by numbers of decayed (DT), missing (MT), and filled teeth (FT), DMFT index. The DT component consisted of primary and secondary caries in dentine, cavitated root caries, and remaining roots. Questionnaires were used to assess self-rated general health and socioeconomic position, denoted by education, household income, and employment status. Associations between self-rated health and caries experience (DMFT) and components (DT, MT, and FT) were assessed using negative binomial regression models. Ratios of means (RMs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations were estimated, adjusting for socioeconomic position.
resultsIndividuals with poor self-rated general health had a 29% higher mean number of MT (RM: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.13-1.46]), a 22% higher mean number of DT (RM: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.07-1.39]), and a 7% higher mean number of DMFT (RM: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.04-1.11]) than individuals reporting very good health. Age-stratified analyses presented a more pronounced association between self-rated health and caries experience for individuals below the age of 55 years than for those 55 years or older. Similarly, the association was more evident in women, with significantly higher mean values for DMFT, MT, and FT among women reporting poor health.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated an independent association between poor self-rated health and a higher burden of caries experience, adjusted for education, income, and employment status. The association was stronger in women and individuals below the age of 55 years. These findings add new evidence in understanding caries inequalities through self-rated health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.