Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527930›Full record

ArticleOncology research and treatment2025

Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer.

Enrico Schalk, Alva Seltmann, Boris Böll, Nicola Giesen, Judit Grans-Siebel, Oliver Kriege, Julia Lanznaster, Antrea Minti, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup, Julia Neitz and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Enrico SchalkDepartment of Hematology Oncology and Cell Therapy, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Alva SeltmannInstitute for Diversity Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Boris BöllDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nicola GiesenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Judit Grans-SiebelDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Oliver KriegeDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julia LanznasterDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Passau Hospital, Passau, Germany.
Antrea MintiDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik NaendrupDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julia NeitzDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens PanseDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Martin Schmidt-HieberClinic of Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Nephrology and Diabetology, Medical University Lausitz Carl-Thiem (MUL-CT), Cottbus, Germany.
Ruth Seggewiss-BernhardtDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
Daniel TeschnerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Philipp WeberDepartment of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromaerinnen, Trier, Germany.
Kai WilleUniversity Clinic for Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Palliative Care, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany.
Marie von Lilienfeld-ToalInstitute for Diversity Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marcus HentrichDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMen are generally more susceptible to bacterial infections than women. Central venous catheters (CVCs), often used to administer systemic treatment in patients with cancer, are an important source of infection. However, little is known about sex-specific differences of CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to compare CRBSIs in men versus women in a large cohort of patients with cancer.

methodsData were derived from the SECRECY registry including nonselected patients with centrally inserted non-tunneled internal jugular or subclavian vein CVCs in 10 hematology and oncology sites in Germany. Only CRBSIs classified as definite CRBSI (dCRBSI) or probable CRBSI were included, and the combination of both was summarized as dpCRBSI. CVCs were matched 1:1 for underlying disease, anatomic site of CVC insertion, type of CVC dressing, antimicrobial coated CVC, complicated CVC insertion, and CVC in situ time by propensity score matching (PSM). Endpoints were CRBSI rates and incidences in CVCs inserted in men versus women.

resultsA total of 5,075 CVCs registered from March 2013 to March 2024 were included in the analysis, of which 3,024 comprise the PSM cohort. A total of 1,512 (50.0%) CVCs were inserted in men. Underlying diseases mainly were hematological malignancies (96.4%). While there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the dCRBSI rate (5.4% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.12) and the dCRBSI incidence (3.8 vs. 2.9/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.11), the rate of dpCRBSI (9.9% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and the dpCRBSI incidence (7.0 vs. 4.7/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in men versus women. The proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci as causative agent of both dCRBSI and dpCRBSI was higher in men than in women (58.8% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.07 and 61.5% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.002, respectively). A multivariable regression revealed neutropenia as an independent risk factor for dCRBSI and male sex as risk factor for dCRBSI and dpCRBSI.

conclusionIn patients with hematological malignancies, men have a higher risk of CRBSI than women. This finding may be attributed to the high number of jugular vein-inserted CVCs, which in men may be associated with higher rates of skin colonization than in women. Special preventive measures such as earlier removal of CVCs in men may be studied in future.

introductionMen are generally more susceptible to bacterial infections than women. Central venous catheters (CVCs), often used to administer systemic treatment in patients with cancer, are an important source of infection. However, little is known about sex-specific differences of CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to compare CRBSIs in men versus women in a large cohort of patients with cancer.

methodsData were derived from the SECRECY registry including nonselected patients with centrally inserted non-tunneled internal jugular or subclavian vein CVCs in 10 hematology and oncology sites in Germany. Only CRBSIs classified as definite CRBSI (dCRBSI) or probable CRBSI were included, and the combination of both was summarized as dpCRBSI. CVCs were matched 1:1 for underlying disease, anatomic site of CVC insertion, type of CVC dressing, antimicrobial coated CVC, complicated CVC insertion, and CVC in situ time by propensity score matching (PSM). Endpoints were CRBSI rates and incidences in CVCs inserted in men versus women.

resultsA total of 5,075 CVCs registered from March 2013 to March 2024 were included in the analysis, of which 3,024 comprise the PSM cohort. A total of 1,512 (50.0%) CVCs were inserted in men. Underlying diseases mainly were hematological malignancies (96.4%). While there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the dCRBSI rate (5.4% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.12) and the dCRBSI incidence (3.8 vs. 2.9/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.11), the rate of dpCRBSI (9.9% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and the dpCRBSI incidence (7.0 vs. 4.7/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in men versus women. The proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci as causative agent of both dCRBSI and dpCRBSI was higher in men than in women (58.8% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.07 and 61.5% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.002, respectively). A multivariable regression revealed neutropenia as an independent risk factor for dCRBSI and male sex as risk factor for dCRBSI and dpCRBSI.

conclusionIn patients with hematological malignancies, men have a higher risk of CRBSI than women. This finding may be attributed to the high number of jugular vein-inserted CVCs, which in men may be associated with higher rates of skin colonization than in women. Special preventive measures such as earlier removal of CVCs in men may be studied in future.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCatheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsBloodstream infectionCancerCentral venous catheterSex

Identifiers

PMID39527930
PMCPMC11809521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.