ArticleJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology2025
Retrospective Comparison of Targeted Anticancer Drugs Predicted by the CNS-TAP Tool Versus Those Selected by a Molecularly Driven Tumor Board in Children With DIPG.
Article in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted therapy in pediatric central nervous system tumors: a review from the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent trial Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium 003 (PNOC003) utilized a molecular tumor board to recommend personalized treatment regimens based on tumor sequencing results in children with DIPG. We separately developed the Central Nervous System Targeted Agent Prediction (CNS-TAP) tool, which numerically scores targeted anticancer agents using preclinical, clinical, and patient-specific data. We hypothesized that highly scored agents from CNS-TAP would overlap with the PNOC003 tumor board's recommendations. For each of the 28 participants, actionable genetic alterations were derived from PNOC003 genomic reports and input to CNS-TAP to identify the highest scoring agents. These agents were then compared with PNOC003 recommendations, with a resultant concordance percentage calculated. Overall, 38% of the total agents recommended by the tumor board were also selected by CNS-TAP, with higher concordance (63%) in a subanalysis including only targeted anticancer agents. Furthermore, nearly all patients (93%) had at least 1 drug chosen by both methods. We demonstrate overlap between agents recommended by CNS-TAP and PNOC003 tumor board, though this does not appear to improve survival. We do observe some discordance, highlighting strengths and limitations of each method. We propose that a combination of expert opinion and data-driven tools may improve targeted treatment recommendations for children with DIPG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.