Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527632›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Kernel machine tests of association using extrinsic and intrinsic cluster evaluation metrics.

Alexandria M Jensen, Peter DeWitt, Brianne M Bettcher, Julia Wrobel, Katerina Kechris, Debashis Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandria M JensenQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6337-9079
Peter DeWittDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Brianne M BettcherBehavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Alzheimer's and Cognitition Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Julia WrobelDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Katerina KechrisDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-5459
Debashis GhoshDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6618-1316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling the network topology of the human brain within the mesoscale has become an increasing focus within the neuroscientific community due to its variation across diverse cognitive processes, in the presence of neuropsychiatric disease or injury, and over the lifespan. Much research has been done on the creation of algorithms to detect these mesoscopic structures, called communities or modules, but less has been done to conduct inference on these structures. The literature on analysis of these community detection algorithms has focused on comparing them within the same subject. These approaches, however, either do not accomodate a more general association between community structure and an outcome or cannot accommodate additional covariates that may confound the association of interest. We propose a semiparametric kernel machine regression model for either a continuous or binary outcome, where covariate effects are modeled parametrically and brain connectivity measures are measured nonparametrically. By incorporating notions of similarity between network community structures into a kernel distance function, the high-dimensional feature space of brain networks, defined on input pairs, can be generalized to non-linear spaces, allowing for a wider class of distance-based algorithms. We evaluate our proposed methodology on both simulated and real datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainComputational BiologyCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID39527632
PMCPMC11581413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.