ArticlePloS one2024
Explainable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis in traumatic brain injury: A discovery and validation study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Accuracy is not enough: explainable boosting machine model and identification of candidate biomarkers for real-time sepsis risk assessment in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Associations between sepsis occurrence, hemoglobin level and mortality in patients with non-trauma hemorrhagic brain injuries: trajectory-based analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Factors influencing sepsis associated thrombocytopenia (SAT): A multicenter retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for consciousness disorders in stroke patients in the intensive care unit (ICU): a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at high risk for infection and sepsis. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an explainable machine learning(ML) model based on clinical features for early prediction of the risk of sepsis in TBI patients.
methodsWe enrolled all patients with TBI in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database from 2008 to 2019. All patients were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). The univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used for feature selection. Six ML methods were applied to develop the model. The predictive performance of different models were determined based on the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves in the test cohort. In addition, we selected the eICU Collaborative Research Database version 1.2 as the external validation dataset. Finally, we used the Shapley additive interpretation to account for the effects of features attributed to the model.
resultsOf the 1555 patients enrolled in the final cohort, 834 (53.6%) patients developed sepsis after TBI. Six variables were associated with concomitant sepsis and were used to develop ML models. Of the 6 models constructed, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.807 and an accuracy of 74.5% in the internal validation cohort, and an AUC of 0.762 for the external validation. Feature importance analysis revealed that use mechanical ventilation, SAPSII score, use intravenous pressors, blood transfusion on admission, history of diabetes, and presence of post-stroke sequelae were the top six most influential features of the XGB model.
conclusionAs shown in the study, the ML model could be used to predict the occurrence of sepsis in patients with TBI in the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.