Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Grade prediction of lesions in cerebral white matter using a convolutional neural network.

Noriaki Takemura, Yuya Shinkawa, Kazuo Ishii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noriaki TakemuraDepartment of Applied Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suwa University of Science, Chino, Nagano, Japan.
Yuya ShinkawaKurume University Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuo IshiiDepartment of Applied Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suwa University of Science, Chino, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We established a diagnostic method for cerebral white matter lesions using MRI images and examined the relationship between the MRI images and the medical checkup data. There were approximately 25 MRI images for each patient's head, from the top of the head to near the eyes. To order these images, we defined the unit of axial for convenience. We varied conditions, such as the location and extent of the images to be loaded, into a convolutional neural network model and verified the changes in discrimination performance on the test data. Co-occurrence network diagrams were also used to determine the relationship between the grade of cerebral white matter lesions and the biochemical test items, which were treated as categorical variables, the progression of cerebral white matter lesions, and patient health status. The convolutional neural network showed the highest discrimination performance when the images were loaded into the model with 80 pixels per side, axial from 9 to 15, along with FLAIR and T1-weighted images. The area under the curve for each grade was 0.9814 for grade 0, 0.9800 for grade 1, 0.9905 for grade 2, 0.9977 for grade 3, and 0.9998 for grade 4. In the co-occurrence network diagram, patients with no or mild cerebral white matter lesions, such as grade 0 and grade 1, had near normal blood pressure, whereas grade 2 patients were closer to (isolated) systolic hypertension. This indicates that patients with higher-grade cerebral white matter lesions tend to experience more severe hypertension.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerWhite MatterAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39527563
PMCPMC11554140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.