ArticlePloS one2024
Postoperative Karnofsky performance status prediction in patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma: A multimodal approach integrating clinical and deep imaging features.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which Clinical, Radiological, Inflammatory, and Lesion-Related Characteristics Are Associated with Early Neurological Decompensation After Intracranial Mass Lesion Surgery?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Invasiveness-related microRNA expression in glioma: associations with clinical outcomes, tumor burden, and health-related quality of life.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker in Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Retrospective Study Integrating 3 Machine Learning Models and Cox Regression.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Prognostic relationship of peripheral blood-immune inflammatory index (C-PLAN) in patients with high-grade glioma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparing Handcrafted Radiomics Versus Latent Deep Learning Features of Admission Head CT for Hemorrhagic Stroke Outcome Prediction.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Development of Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Post-Surgery Functional Improvement in High-Grade Glioma Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a machine learning model integrating ultrasound features and inflammatory markers (OVART-ML) for predicting ovarian torsion and ischemic necrosis risk in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- PD-1 inhibitor therapy combined with argon-helium cryoablation is effective against non-small cell lung cancer.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeGlioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor with limited survival that poses challenges in predicting patient outcomes. The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score is a valuable tool for assessing patient functionality and contributes to the stratification of patients with poor prognoses. This study aimed to develop a 6-month postoperative KPS prediction model by combining clinical data with deep learning-based image features from pre- and postoperative MRI scans, offering enhanced personalized care for glioblastoma patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing 1,476 MRI datasets from the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2020 public database, we pretrained two variational autoencoders (VAEs). Imaging features from the latent spaces of the VAEs were used for KPS prediction. Neural network-based KPS prediction models were developed to predict scores below 70 at 6 months postoperatively. In this retrospective single-center analysis, we incorporated clinical parameters and pre- and postoperative MRI images from 150 newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma, divided into training (100 patients) and test (50 patients) sets. In training set, the performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calculated through fivefold cross-validation repeated 10 times. The final evaluation of the developed models assessed in the test set.
resultsAmong the 150 patients, 61 had 6-month postoperative KPS scores below 70 and 89 scored 70 or higher. We developed three models: a clinical-based model, an MRI-based model, and a multimodal model that incorporated both clinical parameters and MRI features. In the training set, the mean AUC was 0.785±0.051 for the multimodal model, which was significantly higher than the AUCs of the clinical-based model (0.716±0.059, P = 0.038) using only clinical parameters and the MRI-based model (0.651±0.028, P<0.001) using only MRI features. In the test set, the multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.810, outperforming the clinical-based (0.670) and MRI-based (0.650) models.
conclusionThe integration of MRI features extracted from VAEs with clinical parameters in the multimodal model substantially enhanced KPS prediction performance. This approach has the potential to improve prognostic prediction, paving the way for more personalized and effective treatments for patients with glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.