ArticlePloS one2024
Scallop fishing activity characterization in Southern New England: Offshore wind demands and fisheries-dependent methods.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managers attempt to minimize spatial use conflicts in siting of offshore wind developments, but they must rely on available data to balance biological, commercial, and recreational needs. Marine spatial planning products are only as good as the data they are built upon and fishing data present major challenges due to their confidentiality and the difficulty in isolating true fishing activity. We present a methodology to increase the spatiotemporal resolution of fishing effort and exposure estimates for Southern New England scallop fishing activity using random decision forests to perform supervised classification on AIS data, with fallback to lower resolution datasets for vessels without AIS coverage. Final predictive accuracy of the tuned random forest AIS model was 97.9%, offering improvements of 24.7, 48.6, and 50% over VTR fishing footprints, and AIS and VMS speed cutoff methods, respectively, to predict whether vessel locations correspond to fishing activity. Comparison of the AIS model with VMS and VTR fallback to the VTR fishing footprints data product demonstrated that the increased precision of the AIS point data delineated as fishing dramatically changed how fishing effort, and therefore exposure in the form of fishery landings values, is distributed spatially in Southern New England wind energy areas. This is due to how the probability of fishing is distributed across location data points in the various products, which has implications for marine spatial planning and mitigation decision-making. Therefore, multiple data products should be considered when evaluating management options, as exposure estimates may differ depending on what inputs are used. The higher resolution AIS product may offer enhanced value in understanding exposure and impacts to individual vessels, especially once wind farms are under construction or operational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.