ReviewPsychological research2024
The effect of inverting decades and units on the retention of two-digit numbers in working memory: a matter of the output mode.
Review in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Language-dependency of the left-digit effect in number line estimation and the role of number word inversion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Effect of Writing Direction and Task-Specific Experience on Mapping Time and Numbers on Space.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Transcoding number words to typed multi-digit numerals: revisiting the strange case in Arabic bilinguals.Psychological research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Number-word structure affects transcoding and relates to working memory capacity (WMc). We tested the relationship between the structure of number-words (inverted "Units-Decades (UD) format" or not "Decades-Units (DU) format") and performance on the digit span task for recalling two-digit number-words presented verbally, using two modes of output. University students, native speakers of Arabic, who were also highly proficient in Hebrew, and native speakers of Hebrew, were asked to response by typing Arabic digits or recalling numbers verbally. Arabic and Hebrew speakers were equal in WMc for one-digit numbers in the two modes. However, when inversion was presented, performance was related to output and participants habits. In the typing response, both groups showed better performance for the DU format. In the native language (standard format), Arabic speakers (UD) remembered fewer numbers than Hebrew speakers (DU). Arabic speakers show inversion errors even in the noninverted format. For verbal responses, there were no differences between the groups in their standard format, and native speakers of Arabic weren't affected by the format, while Hebrew speakers still preferred the DU format. Experience with inverted and noninverted language affected WMc but is also related to the output demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.