ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[The "oncological trace": circulating tumor DNA in uveal melanomas].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Liquid biopsy proteomics in ophthalmology : A clinical and scientific perspective].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCell-free DNA (cfDNA) and the tumor DNA it contains can be detected in various body fluids and can be obtained in a minimally invasive manner using a liquid biopsy. The fragmented cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) serves as a marker for the presence of tumor cells in the body and its analysis enables genetic tumor characteristics to be determined. For some nonocular tumors ctDNA is already approved as a predictive or prognostic marker.
methodsThis literature review article describes examples of the use of ctDNA as a biomarker in nonocular tumors and the current status of ctDNA analysis in cases of uveal melanomas. For this purpose, a selective literature search was carried out via PubMed.
resultsUveal melanomas are nowadays usually treated by eye-preserving therapy. In these cases, there is usually no tumor tissue available for further diagnostic testing. Alternatively, molecular characteristics of the tumor can be determined by the genetic analysis of ctDNA. In uveal melanomas the presence of ctDNA in the plasma at the time of the primary diagnosis is controversial; however, an increase in the amount of ctDNA, which can be used to investigate diagnostically and prognostically relevant genetic changes, was detected during irradiation therapy of the primary tumor in some patients. In the later course of the disease, the amount of ctDNA in the plasma is a suitable marker for metastatic progression. In some cases, an increase in ctDNA levels could be recognized several months before the clinical detection of metastases.
conclusionThe analysis of cfDNA in patients with a uveal melanoma is a promising and minimally invasive method for obtaining information about the tumor or the course of the disease. It is currently being investigated which patients could benefit from it in the future. Several issues related to standardization and technical validation must be addressed for its routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39527289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.