ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Unilateral double fenestration of the same posterior cerebral artery at P1 segment: first cadaveric case report and literature review.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Right posterior cerebral artery fenestration coexisting with bilateral superior cerebellar artery duplications diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArterial fenestration involves an artery emerging from the same embryological origin, with its lumen divided into two channels that subsequently rejoin. This kind of vascular variant has consequences, such as focal defects in the histologic layers of the arteries, hemodynamic stress, and challenges for endovascular procedures in the management of vascular pathologies. The main objective of this work is to present a rare vascular variant, a double fenestration of the same P1 segment of a cadaveric specimen, and a literature review of these kind of vascular variants.
methodsA cadaveric study was performed in which 20 central nervous system specimens, from patients without neurological pathology obtained as a donation from the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, were dissected for educational and research purposes.
resultsIn one specimen it was found a double fenestration of the right P1 segment, associated with a single fenestration of the right superior cerebellar artery. Few cases of posterior circulation fenestration, beyond the vertebrobasilar trunk are reported in the literature, with limited understanding of the potential hemodynamic consequences thereof. In all the literature available, only eight cadaveric cases of P1 segment fenestration are documented, often linked with other central nervous system vascular abnormalities such as aneurysms or duplications.
conclusionsThere is a single report of unilateral double P1 segment fenestration in a living patient. To our knowledge, this is the second case reported in the literature on this specific anatomical anomaly, and the first such report in a cadaver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39527251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.