Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527173›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2024

Polymer-drug conjugates: revolutionizing nanotheranostic agents for diagnosis and therapy.

Ashish Kumar Parashar, Gaurav Kant Saraogi, Pushpendra Kumar Jain, Balakdas Kurmi, Vivek Shrivastava, Vandana Arora

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. ModularFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashish Kumar ParasharLloyd Institute of Management and Technology, Plot No.-11, Knowledge Park-II, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, 201306. ashish.parashar1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-2594
Gaurav Kant SaraogiSri Aurobindo Institute of Pharmacy, Indore, India.
Pushpendra Kumar JainIIMT College of Pharmacy, Greater Noida, India.
Balakdas KurmiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College Pharmacy, GT Road, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Vivek ShrivastavaSchool of Pharmacy, Parul University, Vadodara, 391760, India.
Vandana AroraLloyd Institute of Management and Technology, Plot No.-11, Knowledge Park-II, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, 201306.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotheranostics, an amalgamation of therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities at the nanoscale, is revolutionizing personalized medicine. Polymer-drug conjugates (PDCs) stand at the forefront of this arena, offering a multifaceted approach to treat complex diseases such as cancer. This review explores the recent advancements in PDCs, highlighting their design principles, working mechanisms, and the therapeutic applications. We discuss the incorporation of imaging agents into PDCs that allow for real-time monitoring of drug delivery and treatment efficacy. With the aim of improving patient care, the review examines how PDCs enable targeted drug delivery, minimize side effects, and provide valuable diagnostic data, hence enhancing the precision of medical interventions. We also address the challenges facing the clinical translation of PDCs, such as scalability, regulatory hurdles, and cost-effectiveness, providing a comprehensive outlook on the future of nanotheranostics in patient management.

Indexed as

Imaging agentsNanomedicineNanotheranosticsPolymer-drug conjugatesPrecision medicineTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID39527173
PMCPMC11554983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.