ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Appropriateness of intravenous fluid prescriptions in hospitalised patients: a point prevalence study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedural and Therapy Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Framework for Safety, Quality and Patient-Centred Care.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Nurses' Self-Reported Practices and Prescribers' Expectations in Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Hospitalised Patients: A Survey Study and Clinical Documentation Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Determinants of pain, anxiety and patient satisfaction during intravenous injection: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate use of intravenous (IV) fluids results in fluid overload, electrolyte disturbances, and increased costs.
aimTo describe IV fluid prescribing and its appropriateness in hospitalised patients.
methodA point prevalence study was conducted at two sites (academic and general) of a tertiary care hospital in Belgium. All inpatients (except those in the operating theatre) and all IV fluids prescribed during a 24-h period were analysed. Data collected included type, rate and volume administered. Each IV fluid was classified by indication (i.e., resuscitation/replacement, maintenance, catheter patency management, drug administration). Appropriateness was assessed using predefined criteria and validation by attending clinicians.
resultsIV fluids were administered to 60% (297) of patients, with a median of 3 [IQR 0.5-6] IV fluid bags per patient and a median daily volume of 1000 ml [IQR 100-1550]. Amongst the 1162 IV fluid prescribed bags, 61.2% (712) were for drug administration, 22.1% (257) for catheter patency, 9.7% (112) for maintenance and 7.1% (82) for replacement/resuscitation. Inappropriate use was found for 56.9% (169) of patients with an IV fluid, representing a median volume of 300 ml per patient [IQR 10-500], and median costs of 4.60 € per patient [IQR 0.4-6.7].
conclusionInappropriate IV fluid use is frequent in hospitalised patients, and results in significant costs. Optimisation strategies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39527169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.