ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024
[My patients can go home in the evening after pulmonary vein isolation : Pros and cons].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [The EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS/AEPC consensus statement on the management of atrial tachycardias : Implications of the SMART-AT 10-point plan for clinical practice and healthcare structures].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the background of optimizing financial and personnel resources while aligning with patient needs, the concept of same-day discharge following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) appears attractive. However, a non-selective approach to different strategies is inappropriate, as is often the case in medicine. A "one size fits all" approach is therefore not advisable for outpatient PVI. Instead, the primary focus should be on identifying which patients can safely and effectively undergo PVI in an outpatient setting and which patients would benefit from inpatient care. Both procedural and patient-specific criteria should be considered in this context. In addition, structural prerequisites must also be met. Ultimately, the decision as to whether outpatient PVI is feasible should remain with the treating physician and the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39527167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.