ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for predicting the histological grade of rectal cancer: a comparative study with amide proton transfer-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CEST MRI in the Management/Diagnosis of Neuroinfectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the utility of glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST) MRI with non-contrast injection in predicting the histological grade of rectal cancer.
methodsThis prospective analysis included 60 patients with preoperative rectal cancer who underwent pelvic glucoCEST, amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). In total, 21 low-grade and 39 high-grade cases were confirmed by postoperative pathology. The MTRasym (1.2 ppm), MTRasym (3.5 ppm), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of lesions between the low-grade and high-grade groups were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was generated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each technique. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was applied to determine independent predictors and for multi-parameter combined diagnosis.
resultsElevated MTRasym (1.2 ppm), MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values and lower ADC values were observed in the high-grade group compared with low-grade cases (all p < 0.01). The AUCs of MTRasym (1.2 ppm), MTRasym (3.5 ppm), and ADC for differentiating between low- and high-grade rectal cancer cases were 0.792, 0.839, and 0.855, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the combination of the three indexes was improved (AUC, 0.969; sensitivity, 95.24%; specificity, 87.18%). The good consistency and reliability of the combination of independent predictors were demonstrated by calibration curve analysis and DCA.
conclusionThe glucoCEST MRI without contrast injection, APTWI, and DWI all facilitate the assessment of histological grade in rectal cancer, and the combination of the three can effectively discriminate between high- and low-grade rectal cancer, which is expected to be a promising imaging marker. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI method facilitates the assessment of histological grade in rectal cancer and offers additional information to improve the diagnostic performance of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging. KEY POINTS: Glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging could differentiate histological grade. Amide proton transfer-weighted and diffusion-weighted were associated with histological grade. The combination of different parameters showed the best diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.