ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Five years of emergency keratoplasty at a tertiary eye hospital.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A thirteen-year tertiary centre experience with infectious keratitis in the elderly population.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to present the results of patients who underwent emergency keratoplasty for tectonic or therapeutic reasons.
methodsMedical records of 33 patients who underwent tectonic or therapeutic keratoplasty at Ege University Department of Ophthalmology between January 2019 and January 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, ocular and systemic findings, indications of keratoplasty, size of grafts, need for re-keratoplasty, preoperative treatment modalities, need for additional surgical interventions, and prognosis of the patients were investigated.
resultsDuring this period, 450 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) surgeries were performed and 34 (7.55%) were emergency PK (34 eyes of 33 patients). The mean age of the patients was 65.30 ± 15.40 (40-91). Female to male ratio was 18/15. 17 (50.00%) emergency PKs were performed for tectonic and 17 (50.00%) were performed for therapeutic purposes. Mean follow up time was 24.85 ± 26.62 (2-120) months. A total of 20 (58.82%) eyes required additional surgery, 9 (26.47%) of which required re-keratoplasty with different indications during follow-up. Graft rejection or failure developed in 17 (50.00%) of the eyes in an average of 12.05 (1-45) months. Evisceration was needed in 2 (5.88%) eyes.
conclusionDespite limited access to donor cornea and high complication rate, emergency keratoplasty is one of the most important options that retain ocular integrity in the treatment of corneal infections and non-traumatic corneal perforations unresponsive to conventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39527140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.