ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Impact of family mutual aid system for personal medical insurance accounts on paediatric patients' outpatient utilization patterns and costs: a difference-in-differences analysis.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the effect of the transformation of paediatric healthcare through the implementation of the Family Mutual Aid System (FMAS) for personal medical insurance accounts among paediatric patients at a children's hospital (Hospital A in Shanghai, China). We conducted a cohort study in the endocrinology department of Hospital A from August 2021 to July 2023 to assess the impact of FMAS enrolment on patients' annual outpatient visits, annual outpatient expenditures, and the allocation of these costs among the basic medical insurance pooling fund and patients' out-of-pocket expenses, with a further subdivision into online and offline consultations. Analysis employed a weighted difference-in-differences approach within a fixed-effects model following propensity score matching. The study encompassed 10 975 paediatric patients, divided into those enrolled in FMAS (observation group) and those not (control group). Enrolment in FMAS was associated with a statistically significant increase in annual outpatient visits by an average of 1.107, predominantly attributed to an uptick in offline consultations. Additionally, there was a substantial 38.9% rise in annual outpatient costs. Detailed analysis revealed a 52.5% increase in costs covered by the medical insurance pooling fund, while patients' out-of-pocket expenses decreased by an average of 69.2%. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of FMAS enrolment on healthcare service utilization and the risk-sharing mechanisms of medical insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.