Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527057›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Air Purifiers and Acute Respiratory Infections in Residential Aged Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bismi Thottiyil Sultanmuhammed Abdul Khadar, Jenny Sim, Vanessa M McDonald, Julee McDonagh, Matthew Clapham, Brett G Mitchell

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Health Benefits of Air Purification: A Systematic Review.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Error in Funding/Support.JAMA network open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bismi Thottiyil Sultanmuhammed Abdul KhadarSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jenny SimSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Vanessa M McDonaldSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Julee McDonaghSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew ClaphamHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Brett G MitchellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effectiveness of in-room air purification for the reduction of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in residential aged-care facilities (RACFs) is unknown. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of in-room air purifiers with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-14 filters in reducing the incidence of ARIs among residents of RACFs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial used a multicenter, double-blind, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover design for 6 months from April 7 to October 26, 2023, in 3 RACFs with a bed capacity of 50 to 100 in New South Wales, Australia. The purposive sampling approach included permanent residents in private rooms in the enrolled RACFs. Data collection was performed every 2 weeks and required no additional follow-up beyond the final data collection on October 31, 2023. Intervention: An air purifier containing a HEPA-14 filter was placed in rooms of participants in the intervention group, and an air purifier without a HEPA-14 filter was placed in rooms of the control participants. The groups crossed over after 3 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of ARIs, assessed with logistic mixed-model regression. Results: Among 135 participants randomized (70 to the intervention-first group and 65 to the control-first group), 78 (57.8%) were female; mean (SD) age was 85.2 (8.6) years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the use of air purifiers with HEPA-14 filters did not reduce ARIs compared with the control (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-1.04; P = .07). Among the 104 participants who completed the entire study, the intervention reduced ARI incidence from 35.6% (37 participants) in the control group to 24.0% (25 participants) in the intervention group (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.00; P = .048). Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinical trial investigating use of air purifiers with HEPA-14 filters for reducing ARIs, no significant between-group difference was found in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, a significant reduction in ARIs was identified among participants who completed the entire study. These findings may help inform future large-scale studies of respiratory infectious diseases. Trial Registration: ANZCTR identification: ACTRN12623000347662.

Indexed as

Air FiltersRespiratory Tract InfectionsAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAir Pollution, IndoorCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansIncidenceMaleNew South Wales

Identifiers

PMID39527057
PMCPMC11555545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.