Trial reportCritical care medicine2025
Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.
Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report (HABC-M SR) in assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) among Acute Respiratory Failure ICU survivors.
designSecondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
settingPatients evaluated by a nurse care coordinator in an out-of-hospital setting. PATIENTS: English-speaking adults 18 years old or older who were admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 24 hours.
interventionsPatients randomized to the intervention arm of the mobile critical care recovery program, a negative trial testing multidisciplinary care to improve quality of life. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsHABC-M SR scale was used to assess PICS in the intervention group at ICU discharge, 3, and 6 months post-discharge. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity Scale; Timed Up and Go; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep scores were obtained at the same time. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered at baseline and 6 months. ICU survivors reported mild PICS symptoms, which improved over 6 months (mean HABC-M SR scores: baseline [8.5, sd 7.6], 3 mo [5.3 mo, sd 6.6 mo], and 6 mo [5.2 mo, sd 6.9 mo; p < 0.001]). HABC-M SR total score had moderate internal consistency that improved over time (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78 at baseline and 0.84 at 6 mo). The psychological subscale of HABC-M SR was moderately correlated with standardized scales for mood, pain, and sleep. The cognitive subscale was not significantly correlated with MMSE.
conclusionsWhile HABC-M SR correlated with mood, physical, and sleep symptoms, the cognitive subscale was less sensitive compared with standardized scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.