ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Impact of COVID-19 on intrapartum care at public hospitals in the Sidama region, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the health of pregnant women and their unborn babies.
objectiveTo explore the impact of COVID-19 on intrapartum care in Ethiopia.
designA concurrent mixed-methods design was employed.
methodsAn interrupted time series analysis was implemented using a Poisson regression model to estimate monthly changes in the incidence rates of institutional childbirth, instrumental vaginal birth, caesarean section, stillbirth, institutional neonatal death, institutional maternal death and availability of essential medical supplies before and during COVID-19. The dataset included data from all women who gave birth in 15 public hospitals, and the total number of childbirths in the cohort study before COVID-19 (12 months of data from March 2019 to February 2020) was 24,478, while during COVID-19 (6 months of data from March to August 2020), the total number of childbirths in the cohort study was 11,966, forming a combined final dataset of 36,444. Simultaneously, a descriptive qualitative study using a purposive sampling technique was conducted through in-depth interviews until data saturation was reached, with data were collected from 14 February to 10 May 2022. Data from the interviews were imported into NVivo 12 Plus to perform an inductive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using joint display methods to identify corroboration or contradiction between the different forms of evidence.
resultsOur findings indicate that the incidence rates of caesarean sections and instrumental vaginal births significantly increased in the first 6 months of COVID-19. Three themes were identified: '
conclusionIn combination, the three themes contributed to a considerable increase in neonatal and maternal deaths. Interventions such as fully equipped labour wards and obstetric triage systems are needed to restore disrupted maternal and perinatal care during the ongoing and future pandemics. In addition, stakeholders should inform the public that blood donations can help the community recover from recent shocks in emergency health and future pandemics. Further research should investigate the long-term impact of COVID-19 on maternity care and maternal and infant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.