Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526649›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2025

Decision fatigue in hospital settings: A scoping review.

Kelsey Perry, Sarah Jones, Julia C Stumpff, Rachel Kruer, Lauren Czosnowski, Deanne Kashiwagi, Areeba Kara

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. A Two-Level, Multidimensional Framework for Understanding and Treating Clinician Fatigue.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelsey PerryMedicine-Pediatrics Residency, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sarah JonesInpatient Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Julia C StumpffRuth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Rachel KruerPharmacy, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-7375
Lauren CzosnowskiPharmacy, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Deanne KashiwagiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Areeba KaraDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-3857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Decision Fatigue" (DF) describes the impaired ability to make decisions because of repeated acts of decision-making.

objectivesWe conducted a scoping review to describe DF in inpatient settings.

methodsTo be included, studies should have explored a clinical decision, included a mechanism to account for the order of decision making, and be published in English in or after the year 2000. Six databases were searched. Retrieved citations were screened and retained studies were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. References of included studies were manually searched, and forward citation searches were conducted to capture relevant sources.

resultsThe search retrieved 12,781 citations, of which 41 were retained following screening. Following review, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half were conference abstracts and none examined hospitalists. Emergency medicine and intensive care settings were the most frequently studied clinical environments (n = 13, 81%). All studies were observational. The most frequently examined decisions were about resource utilization (n = 8, 50%), however only half of these examined downstream clinical outcomes. Decision quality against prespecified standards was examined in four (25%) studies. Work environment and patient attributes were often described but not consistently accounted for in analyses. Clinician attributes were described in four (25%) investigations. Findings were inconsistent: both supporting and refuting DF's role in the outcome studied.

conclusionsThe role of clinician, patient, and work environment attributes in mediating DF is understudied. Similarly, the context surrounding the decision under study require further explication and when assessing resource use and decision quality, adjudication should be made against prespecified standards.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingFatigueHospitalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39526649
PMCPMC11963741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.