Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526612›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of dermatology2024

Indirect comparison of deucravacitinib and other systemic treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Asian populations: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

Tsen-Fang Tsai, Yayoi Tada, Camy Kung, Yichen Zhong, Allie Cichewicz, Katarzyna Borkowska, Tracy Westley, Renata M Kisa, Yu-Huei Huang, Xing-Hua Gao and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tsen-Fang TsaiDepartment of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-1474
Yayoi TadaDepartment of Dermatology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Camy KungGlobal Medical Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yichen ZhongWorldwide HEOR, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Allie CichewiczEvidera, Evidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Katarzyna BorkowskaEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, PPD Poland, Warsaw, Poland.
Tracy WestleyEvidera, Evidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Renata M KisaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Yu-Huei HuangDepartment of Dermatology, Chang Ghang Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-1839
Xing-Hua GaoDepartment of Dermatology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-8564
Seong-Jin JoDepartment of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-7672
April W ArmstrongDepartment of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0064-8707

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanding the systemic treatment options for patients with psoriasis, deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor is approved in the United States, European Union, China, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and other countries for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Evidence suggests the comparative efficacy of systemic therapies may be different in Asian versus White patients. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the clinical efficacy associated with deucravacitinib and other biologic or non-biologic systemic treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Asian populations. Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized trials of the interventions of interest. Multinomial random effects models adjusting for baseline placebo risk were used to estimate Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses at weeks 10-16. Of 8596 studies identified, 20 were included in the NMA. The estimated PASI 75 and 90 (95% credible interval) response rates for deucravacitinib were estimated to be 66% (49%-80%) and 40% (24%-58%) in Asian populations, notably higher than placebo (6% [4%-9%] and 1% [0.8-2%]) and apremilast (24% [12%-40%] and 9% [4%-20%]). No statistically significant difference was observed in PASI 75 and 90 responses between deucravacitinib and adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, ustekinumab, and tildrakizumab. Deucravacitinib demonstrated robust efficacy in the Asian population, with PASI 75 and 90 responses comparable to some biologics. Deucravacitinib provides a convenient oral therapy with efficacy similar to several biologic therapies.

Indexed as

Asian PeoplePsoriasisSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThalidomideTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedapremilastBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsThalidomidetildrakizumabApremilastbiologicsdeucravacitinibnetwork meta‐analysispsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID39526612
PMCPMC11624152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.