Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526583›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Shortcutting from self-motion signals reveals a cognitive map in mice.

Jiayun Xu, Mauricio Girardi-Schappo, Jean-Claude Beique, André Longtin, Leonard Maler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiayun Xu *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9505-9253
Mauricio Girardi-Schappo *Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-4905
Jean-Claude BeiqueDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-4906
André LongtinDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-9893
Leonard MalerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-2754

Funding

Brockhouse 493076-2017CIHR 153143CIHR RGPIN/04336-2017Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/06204-2014Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/2017-147489-2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals navigate by learning the spatial layout of their environment. We investigated spatial learning of mice in an open maze where food was hidden in one of a hundred holes. Mice leaving from a stable entrance learned to efficiently navigate to the food without the need for landmarks. We developed a quantitative framework to reveal how the mice estimate the food location based on analyses of trajectories and active hole checks. After learning, the computed 'target estimation vector' (TEV) closely approximated the mice's route and its hole check distribution. The TEV required learning both the direction and distance of the start to food vector, and our data suggests that different learning dynamics underlie these estimates. We propose that the TEV can be precisely connected to the properties of hippocampal place cells. Finally, we provide the first demonstration that, after learning the location of two food sites, the mice took a shortcut between the sites, demonstrating that they had generated a cognitive map.

Indexed as

CognitionAnimalsHippocampusMaleMaze LearningMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpatial Learningactive sensingcognitive mapmouseneuroscienceopen mazeshortcutspatial learningtrajectory analysis

Identifiers

PMID39526583
PMCPMC11554306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.