ArticleRenal failure2024
Prediction of dialysis adequacy using data-driven machine learning algorithms.
Article in Renal failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From assistant to collaborator: A systematic review of the evolution of artificial intelligence in end-stage renal disease care and management.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Validation of online clearance monitoring and machine learning-based prediction of dialysis adequacy in Vietnamese hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate delivery of hemodialysis (HD), measured by the spKt/V derived from urea reduction, is an important determinant of clinical outcomes in chronic hemodialysis patients. However, the need for pre- and postdialysis blood samples prevented the assessment of spKt/V in every session.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study was performed on end-stage renal disease (ESKD) patients aged ≥ 18 years who received standard thrice-weekly chronic HD therapy. Eighty-seven variables, including general, intradialytic, and laboratory variables, were collected from the medical records for analysis. Five steps of preprocessing procedure were deployed to select only the most relevant variables. Six binary classification models were developed to predict whether spKt/V was higher than 1.4.
resultsA total of 1869 HD sessions from 373 ESKD patients were included in this study. The Random Forest model showed the best prediction for dialysis adequacy, with AUROC scores of 0.860 in the validation dataset and 0.873 in the testing dataset. Notably, an accessible model that solely relied on noninvasively collected general and dialysis-related variables maintained high prediction accuracy, with AUROC scores of 0.854 and 0.868 in the validation and testing datasets, respectively. The five most significant predictive variables were vascular access, gender, body mass index, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis duration.
conclusionThe study results suggest that the development of ML models for accurately predicting dialysis adequacy based on general and intradialytic variables is feasible. These models have the potential to be utilized for noninvasive clinical assessments of dialysis adequacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.