ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Association Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Endometriosis from NHANES 2001-2006: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the association between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) and the risk of endometriosis in American women. Methods: The study adopted a cross-sectional design, incorporating 3862 women aged over 20 years, selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset from 2001 to 2006. Six dietary antioxidants were taken into account in calculating CDAI. Endometriosis was determined based on self-report. To evaluate the association between CDAI and the risk of endometriosis, we employed models with multivariable logistic variables. For subgroup assessment in relation to CDAI, a stratified multivariate logistic regression model was utilized. Results: Among all participants, 273 participants (7.1%) were found to exhibit endometriosis. The preliminary analysis showed a reverse association between CDAI and the likelihood of endometriosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92~0.98). Upon full adjustment within the multivariable logistic regression, the ORs (95% CI) for endometriosis prevalence per unit increase in CDAI were estimated to be 0.96 (0.93~1). When the CDAI levels were divided into quartiles, it was found that the ORs for endometriosis with CDAI levels in Q2 (-2.131-0.023), Q3 (0.023-2.650), and Q4 (2.650-42.854) were 0.74 (0.52, 1.05), 0.76 (0.53, 1.1), and 0.53 (0.36, 0.79), respectively, compared to those with CDAI levels in Q1 (-7.151--2.131). We evaluated the association between CDAI and endometriosis using subgroups stratified by age, race/ethnicity, education level, body mass index (BMI), oral contraceptive, and menopausal status, revealing a substantial negative relationship. Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, increasing CDAI was proportionally associated with a reduced risk of endometriosis among American women, suggesting a diet high in antioxidants may play an important role in reducing the risk of endometriosis. The findings of NHANES data spanning 2001 to 2006 suggest that promoting antioxidant-rich diets could be an important prevention strategy for endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.