Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526281›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024

A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy and Review of Literature.

Liqun Xia, Tongyun Qi, Jianhua Qian

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liqun XiaDepartment of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310002, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-1653-9199
Tongyun QiDepartment of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310002, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2662-9187
Jianhua QianDepartment of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310002, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, in which fertilised eggs are implanted in the retroperitoneal cavity. Due to its atypical location and non-specific symptoms, REP is often misdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment. This condition poses serious risks owing to its proximity to the retroperitoneal blood vessels. Limited research and lack of specific guidelines make the management of REP challenging. Case Report and Literature Review: A 47-year-old woman with REP was initially misdiagnosed as having acute gastroenteritis due to severe abdominal pain and gastrointestinal symptoms. She had amenorrhoea and significant lower abdominal pain, but no vaginal bleeding. After 35 days of amenorrhoea, the patient's serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level was 16111.94 mIU/mL. Imaging revealed no intrauterine gestational sac; however, a mass was detected in the left adnexal area. Emergency laparoscopy identified a 3.0 cm ectopic mass in the retroperitoneal space, adjacent to the lower edge of the left broad ligament and near critical structures, with surface rupture and bleeding. The mass was surgically removed, and the patient's β-hCG levels returned to normal 33 days post-surgery. In addition, we reviewed previously published English literature on REP, highlighting its characteristics, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment with the aim of improving the understanding and management of the condition. Conclusion: REP is difficult to diagnose because of its rarity and nonspecific symptoms. Early diagnosis relies on serum β-hCG testing, ultrasonography, and radiological examination. When β-hCG is elevated and no gestational sac is found within the uterus or at common ectopic sites, REP should be considered. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for this condition.

Indexed as

ectopic pregnancylaparoscopyretroperitoneal ectopic pregnancysurgeryultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39526281
PMCPMC11549912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.