Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526250›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Comparation of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Tan Rui, He Wei, Jing Huaibo, Mou Han, Kenneth C P Cheung, Chai Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tan Rui *Department of Interventional Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
He Wei *Department of Radiology, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.
Jing HuaiboDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Mou HanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Kenneth C P CheungHong Kong Phenome Research Center, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chai Yang *Hong Kong Phenome Research Center, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study objective: This study is to uncover the advantages of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the uterine curettage treatment for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of eighty patients with CSP after treatment in our hospital from 01/10/2019 to 01/05/2021. The 80 patients were divided into 2 groups: 41 patients were treated with abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and the control group ( Results: All the operations successfully retained the uterus. No balloon-related complications occurred in the experimental group. And in the control group, there were 14 cases of fever and 19 cases of pain after UAE. The fluoroscopy time of experimental group and control group were: (type II: (20.3 ± 7.1)s vs. (593.7 ± 284.5)s, Conclusion: No balloon-related complications occurred in the abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and lower radiation exposure for both the operator and patient. And both abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and UAE can effectively reduce the bleeding during uterine curettage in patients with type II and III CSP.

Indexed as

abdominal aortic balloon occlusioncesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)interventional therapyuterine artery embolization (UAE)uterine curettage

Identifiers

PMID39526250
PMCPMC11543401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.