ArticleComputing in cardiology2023
Leveraging Unlabeled Electroencephalographic Data to Predict Neurological Recovery for Comatose Patients Following Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust EEG Characteristics for Predicting Neurological Recovery from Coma After Cardiac Arrest.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the 2023 George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge, we propose an automated, unsupervised pre-training approach to boost the performance of models that predict neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest. Our team, (BrownBAI), developed a model architecture consisting of three parts: a pre-processor to convert raw electroencephalograms (EEGs) into two-dimensional spectrograms, a three-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) encoder for unsupervised pre-training, and a time series transformer (TST) model. We trained the CNN encoder on unlabeled five-minute EEG samples from the Temple University EEG Corpus (TUEG), which included more than 20x the patients available in the PhysioNet competition training dataset. We then incorporated the pre-trained encoder into the TST as a base layer and trained the composite model as a classifier on EEGs from the 2023 PhysioNet Challenge dataset. Our team was not able to submit an official competition entry and was therefore not scored on the test set. However, in a side-by-side comparison on the competition training dataset, our model performed better with a pretrained (competition score 0.351), rather than randomly initialized (competition score 0.211) CNN encoder layer. These results show the potential benefits of leveraging unlabeled data to boost task-specific performance of predictive EEG models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.