ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024
When sounds come alive: animacy in the auditory sense.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the interest in animacy perception, few studies have considered sensory modalities other than vision. However, even everyday experience suggests that the auditory sense can also contribute to the recognition of animate beings, for example through the identification of voice-like sounds or through the perception of sounds that are the by-products of locomotion. Here we review the studies that have investigated the responses of humans and other animals to different acoustic features that may indicate the presence of a living entity, with particular attention to the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such perception. Specifically, we have identified three different auditory animacy cues in the existing literature, namely voicelikeness, consonance, and acoustic motion. While the first two characteristics are clearly exclusive to the auditory sense and indicate the presence of an animate being capable of producing vocalizations or harmonic sounds-with the adaptive value of consonance also being exploited in musical compositions in which the musician wants to convey certain meanings-acoustic movement is, on the other hand, closely linked to the perception of animacy in the visual sense, in particular to self-propelled and biological motion stimuli. The results presented here support the existence of a multifaceted auditory sense of animacy that is shared by different distantly related species and probably represents an innate predisposition, and also suggest that the mechanisms underlying the perception of living things may all be part of an integrated network involving different sensory modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.