Article in ZooKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Vladimir PešićDepartment of Biology, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro University of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-345X
Andrzej ZawalInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Center of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland University of Szczecin Szczecin Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-6060
Sónia FerreiraCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-3966
Laura Benitez-BoscoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-8353
Ana Cruz-OliveiraCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.
Dinis GirãoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4842-0721
Adriana PadilhaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.
Paolo TuraccioCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Universidade do Porto Vila do Conde Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8627-6718
Samantha RossiniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6881-2527
Lorenzo BalliniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.
Giorgia StaffoniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5916-1757
Sara FratiniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.
Claudio CiofiDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.
Alessio IannucciDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy University of Florence Sesto Fiorentino Italy.
Torbjørn EkremDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-9211
Elisabeth SturDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study presents the first results from the analysis of water mites collected in Portugal as part of the Biodiversity Genomics Europe project. 307 COI DNA barcodes clustered into 75 BINs are provided, with 38 BINs being unique and deposited for the first time in the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD). 65 species have been identified, of which 36 are new to the water mite fauna of Portugal. Two species,
Indexed as
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)DNA barcodingIberian Peninsulaintegrative taxonomyPortugalsystematics
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
DNA barcode library of Portuguese water mites, with the descriptions of two new species (Acari, Hydrachnidia). · full record | OpenQuestion