ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Predicting 'pain genes': multi-modal data integration using probabilistic classifiers and interaction networks.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Multi-omic integration with human DRG proteomics highlights TNFα signalling as a relevant sexually dimorphic pathway.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Accurate identification of pain-related genes remains challenging due to the complex nature of pain pathophysiology and the subjective nature of pain reporting in humans. Here, we use machine learning to identify possible 'pain genes'. Labelling was based on a gold-standard list with validated involvement across pain conditions, and was trained on a selection of -omics, protein-protein interaction network features, and biological function readouts for each gene. Results: The top-performing model was selected to predict a 'pain score' per gene. The top-ranked genes were then validated against pain-related human SNPs. Functional analysis revealed JAK2/STAT3 signal, ErbB, and Rap1 signalling pathways as promising targets for further exploration, while network topological features contribute significantly to the identification of 'pain' genes. As such, a network based on top-ranked genes was constructed to reveal previously uncharacterized pain-related genes. Together, these novel insights into pain pathogenesis can indicate promising directions for future experimental research. Availability and implementation: These analyses can be further explored using the linked open-source database at https://livedataoxford.shinyapps.io/drg-directory/, which is accompanied by a freely accessible code template and user guide for wider adoption across disciplines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.