Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526039›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Predicting 'pain genes': multi-modal data integration using probabilistic classifiers and interaction networks.

Na Zhao, David L Bennett, Georgios Baskozos, Allison M Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Na ZhaoNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
David L BennettNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Georgios BaskozosNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-5878
Allison M BarryNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-6889

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W002388/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Accurate identification of pain-related genes remains challenging due to the complex nature of pain pathophysiology and the subjective nature of pain reporting in humans. Here, we use machine learning to identify possible 'pain genes'. Labelling was based on a gold-standard list with validated involvement across pain conditions, and was trained on a selection of -omics, protein-protein interaction network features, and biological function readouts for each gene. Results: The top-performing model was selected to predict a 'pain score' per gene. The top-ranked genes were then validated against pain-related human SNPs. Functional analysis revealed JAK2/STAT3 signal, ErbB, and Rap1 signalling pathways as promising targets for further exploration, while network topological features contribute significantly to the identification of 'pain' genes. As such, a network based on top-ranked genes was constructed to reveal previously uncharacterized pain-related genes. Together, these novel insights into pain pathogenesis can indicate promising directions for future experimental research. Availability and implementation: These analyses can be further explored using the linked open-source database at https://livedataoxford.shinyapps.io/drg-directory/, which is accompanied by a freely accessible code template and user guide for wider adoption across disciplines.

Identifiers

PMID39526039
PMCPMC11549022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.