ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2024
DETECT-DVT: Detroit Evaluation of Thrombectomy and Evaluation of Intravascular Ultrasound in Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of risk factors for preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with pelvic fracture.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Syringe-assisted aspiration combined with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy effectively alleviates lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Maneuvering Through the Uncertainty of Deep Vein Thrombosis Interventions: An Encouraging Contemporary Analysis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We sought to evaluate the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in a community hospital setting. Methods: Data were analyzed among patients with lower extremity DVT who underwent MT from December 1, 2021 to December 1, 2022. Results: A total of 1263 patients were evaluated and only 8.8% of patients with DVT received intervention. Of them, 42% were women. The mean age and length of stay were 61.3 years and 3.5 days, respectively. For cases that proceeded to intervention, IVUS was used in 89% of cases, 80% received venoplasty, and 30% received stents. The mean number of MT passes was 4 and the mean contrast volume used was 71 mL. Flow was restored in 96.7% of cases. The procedure was unable to be completed in 1.8% of the cases, and 1.8% had a reported complication after the procedure. Vascular surgery was consulted in 64.4% of the cases, cardiology in 33%, interventional radiology in 12.5%, and 10.9% of the patients had multiple consults. MT was associated with postprocedure reduction of hemoglobin levels (13.4 vs 12.1; Conclusions: MT is shown to be successful in restoring venous flow and is utilized by multiple specialties in the treatment of DVT. Additionally, IVUS was widely used in conjunction with MT, and it was associated with increased advanced interventions, such as venoplasty and stent placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.