ArticleBio-protocol2024
A Real-Time Approach for Assessing Rodent Engagement in a Nose-Poking Go/No-Go Behavioral Task Using ArUco Markers.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating the spatial limits of somatotopic and depth-dependent sensory discrimination stimuli in rats via intracortical microstimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral neuroscience requires precise and unbiased methods for animal behavior assessment to elucidate complex brain-behavior interactions. Traditional manual scoring methods are often labor-intensive and can be prone to error, necessitating advances in automated techniques. Recent innovations in computer vision have led to both marker- and markerless-based tracking systems. In this protocol, we outline the procedures required for utilizing Augmented Reality University of Cordoba (ArUco) markers, a marker-based tracking approach, to automate the assessment and scoring of rodent engagement during an established intracortical microstimulation-based nose-poking go/no-go task. In short, this protocol involves detailed instructions for building a suitable behavioral chamber, installing and configuring all required software packages, constructing and attaching an ArUco marker pattern to a rat, running the behavioral software to track marker positions, and analyzing the engagement data for determining optimal task durations. These methods provide a robust framework for real-time behavioral analysis without the need for extensive training data or high-end computational resources. The main advantages of this protocol include its computational efficiency, ease of implementation, and adaptability to various experimental setups, making it an accessible tool for laboratories with diverse resources. Overall, this approach streamlines the process of behavioral scoring, enhancing both the scalability and reproducibility of behavioral neuroscience research. All resources, including software, 3D models, and example data, are freely available at https://github.com/tomcatsmith19/ArucoDetection. Key features • The ArUco marker mounting hardware is lightweight, compact, and detachable for minimizing interference with natural animal behavior. • Requires minimal computational resources and commercially available equipment, ensuring ease of use for diverse laboratory settings. • Instructions for extracting necessary code are included to enhance accessibility within custom environments. • Developed for real-time assessment and scoring of rodent engagement across a diverse array of pre-loaded behavioral tasks; instructions for adding custom tasks are included. • Engagement analysis allows for the quantification of optimal task durations for consistent behavioral data collection without confirmation biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.