ArticlePulmonary circulation2024
Quantitative pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-energy CT based scoring to estimate perfusion changes after balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of fully automated CT pulmonary angiography in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic disease.European radiology · 2025Article
- From Patient-Specific Hemodynamic Modeling to Clinical Decision-Making in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Opportunities and Caveats.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Lung Perfusion Quantification from Spectral CT Iodine Map in Pulmonary Embolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current methods for quantifying perfusion from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) often rely on semi-quantitative scoring systems and requires an experienced evaluator. Few studies report on absolute quantitative variables derived from the images, and the methods are varied with mixed results. Dual-energy CTPA (DE-CTPA) enables automatic quantification of lung and lobar perfusion with minimal user interaction by utilizing machine learning based software. We aimed to evaluate differences in DE-CTPA derived quantitative perfusion variables between patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This retrospective, single-center, observational study included 162 adult patients diagnosed with PE (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.