ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024
Impact of printing layer thickness on the flexural strength of nanocomposite 3D printed resins: An in vitro comparative study.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Printing Orientation and Ageing on Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Resins for Occlusal Splints.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the influence of various printing layer thicknesses with silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO Material and Methods: Asiga (DentaBASE, Asiga, Erfurt, Germany) and NextDent (Denture 3D+, NextDent B.V., Soesterberg, The Netherlands) 3D-printed resins were modified with different concentrations of SiO Results: For both resins, printing layer thicknesses of 50 µm and 75 µm exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than 100 µm (P < 0.001). The 50 µm thickness showed the greatest flexural strength values (81.65 ± 4.77 MPa and 84.59 ± 6.21 MPa for Asiga and NextDent, respectively). The 100 µm thickness showed the lowest flexural strength values (74.35 ± 5.37 and 73.66 ± 5.55 MPa) for Asiga and NextDent, respectively. The flexural strength significantly increased with the addition of SiO Conclusion: The flexural strength increased with printing layer thicknesses of 50 µm or 75 µm combined with SiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.